THERAPIST
SHARES IN ADCs
Hania
Stromberg, an Albuquerque, NM psychotherapist, has never thought of herself
as being clairvoyant or clairaudient. But recent experiences with clients
undergoing Induced After Death Communication (IADC) therapy suggest that she
has some kind of gift, as she reports being able to share in the contact her
clients seem to be having with deceased loved ones.
“Occasionally I get
visual impressions or pictures, but it is not always visual,”
she explains. “I always have a strong sense of the presence of the
deceased, often hear something they try to convey. It is either an auditory
experience or sort of an auditory thought impression that I know is
not mine.”
In one such shared
experience, a client was grieving the death of his mother and felt much
guilt about having not fulfilled certain obligations. As Stromberg was
administering the eye movements which are part of the induction process, she
felt a “presence” entering the room and then saw a woman in colorful dress
and high heels. The woman, the client’s deceased mother, addressed the
client by a special name of endearment and began discussing problems the
client was having. After the session, Stromberg compared her notes with
what the client related and all were confirmed – the colorful dress, the
high heels, the special term of endearment, the subject of the
conversation.
“Every time I induce
an ADC I feel an invisible portal opening up and a Divine energy pouring
into my office,” Stromberg continues. “It is difficult to explain, but I
would describe the energy as that of a palpable peace and exhilaration at
the same time, and I suspect it is probably the essential healing factor in
these experiences.”
IADC is a
revolutionary new form of grief therapy discovered in 1995 by Dr. Allan
Botkin, a clinical psychologist practicing in Libertyville, Illinois. It
results in patients (i.e., clients)
experiencing the presence of
deceased loved ones, occasionally with deceased enemies. There is often
communication between the deceased and the patient.
‘My clients have experienced it in a variety of forms – auditory, sentient,
olfactory, not always visual, sometimes a combination of different sensory
perceptions,” says Stromberg.
IADC is an
offshoot of EMDR (eye movement desensitization
and reprocessing) therapy, which was discovered by Dr. Francine Shapiro of
California in 1987. While focusing on the therapist’s hand, the patient is
asked to move the eyes left or right rhythmically and focus on a disturbing
thought, feeling, image, or sensation. In IADC therapy, people grieving
the death of someone, or otherwise disturbed by someone’s death, are asked
to focus directly on their sadness during the eye movements.
The typical IADC
involves the patient having seen or heard a deceased person and that
deceased person having told him or her that everything is okay and not to
grieve. In a number of cases, the deceased person has related information
previously unknown to the patient. The therapy works with people of all
beliefs, including atheists and skeptics. The end result is that the
majority of patients (roughly 70 percent) overcome the grief.
Since being trained in
IADC by Botkin in 2004, Stromberg, who received her Master of Arts degree
from the University of New Mexico and her Master of Clinical Social Work
from the University of Kansas, has done around 40 IADC sessions with about
30 of them successes. “Some didn’t really want
to apply themselves,” she explains the failures. “I guess their fears got
in the way, even though they made the initial decision to give it a try, and
others tried perhaps too hard, and that
was blocking their experience. And still some just would not have it, for
reasons not clear to me at all.”
She adds that among
the 10 or so who did not perceive the deceased or got only a vague awareness
of the entity, she
experienced the presence
of
the entity as vividly as she has with the 30 successful cases. Botkin
points out that among those who don’t report contact with the deceased, many
still experience a high reduction in grief.
While Stromberg speaks of entities and alludes to spirits, she prefers not
to take a position relative to the phenomenon, leaving it to the client’s
own interpretation. “I talk about it as an experience,” she explains. “My
position is that it is an unknown and the significance of it is that those
who experience it obtain a degree of peace and happiness, and very often
people who are deep in grief leave with joy.”
Stromberg states that
prior to her IADC experiences she had no specific belief about the survival
of consciousness at death. At the same time, she admits to having a
long-standing interest in spiritual matters. “But I was never particularly
interested in mediumship, after-death communication, that type of thing,”
she clarifies. “In fact, I always shied away from people who had had such
experiences. It just didn’t appeal to me. It has come as a surprise to me
that I am sensitive to experiencing the deceased during the sessions.”
When there is very
personal information coming through to the client, Stromberg does not hear
it. “I am not privy to that and I do not pick up on it.”
Botkin states that he
has had a few other therapists report shared experiences, but Stromberg has
reported them more frequently and consistently
than anyone else. “On the more professional and technical side of things,
Hania is an astute clinician and has been one of the most skilled therapists
I have trained with,” Botkin adds.
Stromberg laments the
fact that many grieving people are not availing themselves of this dynamic
therapy. “There are many people I know for whom it would be so appropriate,
and I would imagine they would jump at it, but they don’t,” she says.
“Mainstream thought is just not really open to it,
and the facilitators of various support groups
for grieving persons usually reject my offers to discuss IADC therapy in
their groups.” As she sees it, this
rejection is either the result of the facilitators not believing the dead
are still around us and have an impact on us, or they fear being criticized
and scorned by their peers. “I also have attempted to interest some of my
therapist friends, but I get only silence from them when I bring it up. The
scientific mind is very much closed when it comes to this type of thing.”
Could it be one big
shared hallucination? “If the client and I are both hallucinating, then
maybe all life is one big hallucination,” she responds, concluding with the
comment that she does not see her ability to share in the IADC experiences
as anything special on her part but as “a gift from God.” – Michael
E. Tymn
|